MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111511957 · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2020.3045665

Deep Learning for MMSE Estimation of a Gaussian Source in the Presence of Bursty Impulsive Noise

2020· article· en· W3111511957 on OpenAlexaff
Imtiaz Ahmed, Md Sahabul Alam, Md. Jahangir Hossain, Georges Kaddoum

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à MontréalCarleton UniversityOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNoise (video)Minimum mean square errorMean squared errorAlgorithmGaussian noiseComputational complexity theoryDeep learningArtificial neural networkGaussianArtificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)StatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a deep learning (DL) based Gaussian source estimation technique when the source is impaired by bursty impulsive noise. This noise is correlated in time, and hence estimating the source with a low-complexity algorithm is a challenging task. To address this challenge, we train a long short term memory (LSTM) based deep neural network (DNN) model offline with different bursty noisy observations and deploy the trained model in real-time. The trained model detects the noise state online and thus applies a linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) method to estimate the source signal. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme, we compare its performance with baseline schemes. Simulation results reveal the effectiveness of the proposed estimation technique in terms of mean square error and computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.784
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications LettersSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207