MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111519065 · doi:10.17981/bilo.2.1.2020.17

Un breve análisis de la mortalidad del Covid-19 en países de América Latina

2020· article· es· W3111519065 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Álvarez Arias, Oscar Arrieta Cueto, Josué Hurtado Rivera, J. Mendoza, Jyam Rico Herrera, Alexander Troncoso-Palacio

Bibliographic record

VenueBoletín de Innovación Logística y Operaciones · 2020
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPublic Health and Environmental Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Quarter (Canadian coin)PandemicGeographyGovernment (linguistics)PopulationSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Political scienceSocioeconomicsDemographyMedicineEconomicsSociologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In early the 2020, the world faced a pandemic caused by Covid-19, which created crises in the health systems and economy of all nations. In Latin America, 1,246,190 cases and 65,228 deaths were recorded during the first four months of that year. Therefore, this study analyzed the data from report 101 of the World Health Organization, with the intention of identifying the countries in Latin America most affected by this crisis. With the use of the Pareto diagram tool, it could be shown that, the sum of positive cases in the countries of Brazil, Peru, Ecuador and Mexico represent approximately 80% of the total report of contagions in Latin America, the number of most alarming cases was recorded in Brazil with more than 70000 and the number of contagions does not exceed 0.1% of the total population of each government, with the exception of Ecuador, which surpassed it. However, this virus was not fatal in the first quarter of 2020 in Latin American countries

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoletín de Innovación Logística y OperacionesSame topicPublic Health and Environmental IssuesFrench-language works237,207