MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111534495 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108513

The Long Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) Suppresses Immunity to Cutaneous Leishmaniasis by Regulating CD4+ T Helper Cell Response

2020· article· en· W3111534495 on OpenAlexafffund
Gaurav Gupta, Zhirong Mou, Ping Jia, Rohit Sharma, Romaniya Zayats, Sayonara M. Viana, Lianyu Shan, Aldina Barral, Viviane Boaventura, Thomas T. Murooka, Abdel Soussi-Gounni, Camila I. de Oliveira, Jude E. Uzonna

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBiomarkers in Disease Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPTX3PathogenesisInflammationInterleukin 17ImmunologyCutaneous leishmaniasisBiologyImmunityT cellTranscription factorImmune systemLeishmaniasisGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The long pentraxin 3 (PTX3) plays a critical role in inflammation, tissue repair, and wound healing. Here, we show that PTX3 regulates disease pathogenesis in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). PTX3 expression increases in skin lesions in patients and mice during CL, with higher expression correlating with severe disease. PTX3-deficient ( PTX3 −/− ) mice are highly resistant to L. major and L. braziliensis infections. This enhanced resistance is associated with increases in Th17 and IL-17A responses. The neutralization of IL-17A abolishes this enhanced resistance, while rPTX3 treatment results in decrease in Th17 and IL-17A responses and increases susceptibility. PTX3 −/− CD4 + T cells display increased differentiation to Th17 and expression of Th17-specific transcription factors. The addition of rPTX3 suppresses the expression of Th17 transcription factors, Th17 differentiation, and IL-17A production by CD4 + T cells from PTX3 −/− mice. Collectively, our results show that PTX3 contributes to the pathogenesis of CL by negatively regulating Th17 and IL-17A responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicBiomarkers in Disease MechanismsFrench-language works237,207