MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Artificial Neural Networks-Extended Great Deluge Model to predict Actuators Displacements for a Morphing Wing Tip System

2020· article· en· W3111572758 on OpenAlex
Abdallah Ben Mosbah, Ruxandra Mihaela Botez, Soumaya Medini, Thiên-My Dao

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueINCAS BULLETIN · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAeroelasticity and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalÉcole de Technologie SupérieurePolytechnique MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec
KeywordsMorphingActuatorWingEngineeringStructural engineeringWing twistAerodynamicsMechanical engineeringAcousticsAngle of attackComputer scienceAerospace engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resin-based fiber composite materials have received attention in aerospace composite engineering, particularly in aircraft morphing structures, due to their high mechanical characteristics, such as stiffness, and because of their potential to highly reduce the structural mass of modern aircraft. Aircraft morphing is referred to as the ability of an aircraft’s surface to change its geometry in flight. The modelling of a dynamic morphing wing system is here studied. The morphing wing was controlled using four electric actuators situated inside of the wing model. The main role of these actuators was to modify the wing upper surface shape designed and manufactured with a flexible material, so that the laminar-to-turbulent flow transition point can move closer to the wing trailing edge, thus causing a minimum viscous drag, for various flow conditions. To determine the skin deflections in the four actuators points, both LVDT and dial indicator gages were positioned on the wing. Four Linear Variable Differential Transducers (LVDTs) were used to indicate the positions of the four actuators, and four Dial Indicators gages were positioned on the wing to measure the real deflections of the flexible composite skin in the four actuation points. The relationship between the Dial Indicators’ values and the LVDTs’ values for a same set-point command signal had a nondeterministic and unpredictable behavior (not a linear one). The values of the displacements given by the LVDTs were different than the values given by the Dial Indicators. In this paper, an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model was investigated created with the aim to predict the displacements of the wing upper surface skin in real time using four actuators. The proposed model was trained using the Extended Great Deluge (EGD) algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it