MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111581706 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.171

EPEN-36. THE TREATMENT OUTCOME OF PAEDIATRIC SUPRATENTORIAL C11ORF95-RELA FUSED EPENDYMOMA: A COMBINED REPORT FROM E-HIT SERIES AND AUSTRALIAN NEW ZEALAND CHILDREN’S HAEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY GROUP

2020· article· en· W3111581706 on OpenAlexaff
Chia Huan Ng, Denise Obrecht, Molly K. Buntine, Olivia Wells, Martin Campbell, Kanika Bhatia, Michael Sullivan, Molly Williams, Dong Anh Khuong Quang, Kathryn M. Kinross, Christine White, Elizabeth M. Algar, Hendrik Witt, Ulrich Schüller, Martin Mynarek, Torsten Pietsch, Nicolas U. Gerber, Martin Benesch, Monika Warmuth‐Metz, Rolf D. Kortmann, Brigitte Bison, Michael D. Taylor, Vijay Ramaswamy, Stefan Rutkowski, Stefan M. Pfister, David Jones, Nicholas G. Gottardo, Katja von Hoff, Kristian W. Pajtler, Jordan R. Hansford

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpendymomaMedicineInternal medicineCohortOncologyChemotherapyRadiation therapyProgression-free survivalSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract AIM Advances in molecular classification of paediatric ependymoma have been pivotal in improving risk stratification and understanding of this disease. C11orf95-RELA fused supratentorial ependymoma (ST-EPN) have been reported to have a poor outcome, with 10-year overall survival (OS) of 49% and progression free survival (PFS) of 19%. A cohort of patients from multiple international institutions with molecularly confirmed C11orf95-RELA fused ST-EPN were reviewed to assess their disease behaviour. METHOD: We reviewed patients with molecularly determined C11orf95-RELA supratentorial ependymoma diagnosed between 1999 – 2019. Demographic information, extent of surgical resection, use of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, disease recurrence, treatment at recurrence and clinical outcome data was collected. PFS and OS of all patients were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS A total of 76 ST-EPN patients with C11orf95-RELA fusion were identified (median age: 7 years3 months, range: 5 months – 18 years7 months). 58 patients (76.3%) had complete surgical resection. 70 patients(92.1%) received radiotherapy. 55 patients(72.3%) received chemotherapy. The 10-year OS of C11orf95-RELA fused ST-EPN was 72.4% and PFS was 63.8%. In contrast, ST-EPN at a single institution with unconfirmed molecular status had an OS of 61.1% and PFS of 34.9%. CONCLUSION Detailed molecular analysis identified distinct subgroups of patients with ST-EPN. Patients from this cohort with C11orf95-RELA methylation profiles had a significantly higher OS compared to previous reports and those with unconfirmed fusion status, emphasising the critical importance of complete molecular profiling to assist in treatment decision making. Complete molecular analysis in future prospective cohorts is essential for accurate risk stratification and treatment selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207