MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111589389 · doi:10.1115/power2020-16902

Optimization and System Identification of a Variable Pico-Scale Hydro Turbine for Pressure Regulation

2020· article· en· W3111589389 on OpenAlexaff
Shi Yu, Youngmok Ko, Han Hu, Jun Seo, Amy M. Bilton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurbineGenetic algorithmControl theory (sociology)Particle swarm optimizationPressure controlPressure dropRange (aeronautics)EngineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringAlgorithmPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent studies from the European Commission estimate that more than 20% of global energy is consumed by pumping systems. Significant research has focused on increasing pump efficiency to lower energy consumption; however, few have looked at the energy lost in use of pressure regulating devices (PRDs). This paper proposes a novel pico-scale hydro turbine that could effectively replace PRDs and generate power while regulating pressure. The proposed hydro turbine has an outer diameter of 4″ and a total length of 5.4″. The turbine uses 14 rotating guide vanes and is attached to a generator with a variable load. To maximize power recovery and pressure control range of the turbine, a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm was used for multi-objective geometry optimization. Then, to build a dynamic model for control system design, parameter identification was conducted using a Gaussian process surrogate model and stochastic search algorithms: particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm. The optimized turbine showed good agreement between simulated and experimental results and achieved a power output of 120 W, pressure drop range of 6 to 27 psi, and maximum hydraulic efficiency of 75% at the rated flow rate of 27 GPM. The optimized turbine shows the potential of pico-turbines for pressure regulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.266

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCavitation Phenomena in PumpsFrench-language works237,207