The outcomes of pregnancies after laparoscopic surgeries for pathologic changes on distal oviduct: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis were aimed to summarize the body of evidence on the prognosis after laparoscopic surgeries for pathological conditions on distal oviducts, then, furthermore, to evaluate prognostic factors for pregnancy outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the body of evidence on this topic, with the review question formulated as “what is the prognosis after the laparoscopic fimbrioplasty, salpingostomy, or salpingoneostomy for patients with pathologic conditions on the distal oviducts.” We searched Medline and EMBASE on June 1st, 2020. Two investigators (HH and ZY) independently screened the references of all retrieved records for potentially eligible studies by firstly, through titles and abstract, and then full-text. A study would be included if it was a primary study reporting pregnancy outcomes of patients after laparascopic surgery. A meta-analysis of the rates of pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage was performed using a random effect model. We identified 3861 records and included 21 reports with 2473 participants. The pooled estimate for the pregnancy rate was 35.1% (95% CI: 30.7%–39.7%, I2 = 78%, low certainty). The pooled estimates for the live birth rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and miscarriage were 24.4% (95% CI: 20.2%–28.8%, I2 = 58%; 1154 participants; low certainty), 6.2% (95% CI: 4.4%–8.2%, I2 = 61%; 2363 participants; low certainty), and 4.6% (95% CI: 2.8%–6.9%, I2 = 10%; 544 participants; low certainty). Our analyses suggested that the more damaged tubal was associated with a decreased pregnancy rate, and patients with moderate or severe adhesion had lower pregnancy rates compared with patients with mild pelvic adhesion. We estimated the pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and miscarriage rate of patients with distal tubal pathology after the laparoscopic fimbrioplasty or salpingostomy. Low certainty evidence suggested that laparoscopic surgery can restore the tubal function and cure infertility and should be considered as an alternative to in vitro fertilization. Tubal damage stage and adhesion are associated with worse pregnancy outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.067 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".