Localization and regulation of claudin-14 in experimental models of hypercalcemia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variations in the claudin-14 ( CLDN14) gene have been linked to increased risk of hypercalciuria and kidney stone formation. However, the exact cellular localization of CLDN14 and its regulation remain to be fully delineated. To this end, we generated a novel antibody that allowed the detection of CLDN14 in paraffin-embedded renal sections. This showed CLDN14 to be detectable in the kidney only after induction of hypercalcemia in rodent models. Protein expression in the kidney is localized exclusively to the thick ascending limbs (TALs), mainly restricted to the cortical and upper medullary portion of the kidney. However, not all cells in the TALs expressed the tight junction protein. In fact, CLDN14 was primarily expressed in cells also expressing CLDN16 but devoid of CLDN10. CLDN14 appeared in very superficial apical cell domains and near cell junctions in a belt-like formation along the apical cell periphery. In transgenic mice, Cldn14 promotor-driven LacZ activity did not show complete colocalization with CLDN14 protein nor was it increased by hypercalcemia, suggesting that LacZ activity cannot be used as a marker for CLDN14 localization and regulation in this model. In conclusion, CLDN14 showed a restricted localization pattern in the apical domain of select cells of the TAL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it