Late Ordovician Mafic Magmatic Event, Southeast Siberia: Tectonic Implications, LIP Interpretation, and Potential Link with a Mass Extinction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A geochronological, isotopic, and geochemical study of the Suordakh event of mafic magmatic intrusions on the southeast Siberian margin was undertaken. U-Pb baddeleyite dating of a mafic sill intruding lower Cambrian rocks, yielded a 458 ± 13 Ma emplacement age. The chemical composition and stratigraphic setting of this dated sill differed from that previously attributed to the Suordakh event, implying that additional intrusions, previously mapped as Devonian, potentially belonged to the Suordakh event. No correlation between L.O.I. and concentration of highly mobile major and trace elements was documented, showing small or no influence of hydrothermal alteration on the chemical composition of the intrusions. A new tectonic reconstruction located an island arc and active margin relatively close to the study area. However, all samples had chemical compositions close to that of OIB and did not display Ta-Nb and Ti-negative anomalies, nor other features typical for subduction-related magmatism. The major and trace element distribution was most characteristic of within-plate basalts with the mantle source composition being transitional from spinel to garnet lherzolite. Combining four U-Pb baddeleyite dates of mafic sills and dykes from southeast Siberia, the age of the Suordakh event was estimated at 454 ± 10 Ma. The area of the Suordakh event was at least 35,000–40,000 km2 (an estimate including sills previously interpreted as Devonian), and could be increased with additional dating in Southeastern Siberia. Similar ages for within-plate intrusions were reported from South Korea, West Mongolia, South Argentina, North Iran and Northwest Canada, and these ca. 450 Ma ages were collectively close in timing with the latest Ordovician (Hirnantian) mass extinction. More high-precision dating is necessary to fully test a link between the Suordakh event (and the other age-correlative events) and the end-Ordovician mass extinction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".