MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3111669300 · doi:10.1002/alz.040689

Amyloid (a), tau (t) and voxel‐based morphometry (n) correlates of visual memory performance

2020· article· en· W3111669300 on OpenAlexaff
Jaime Fernández Arias, Tharick A. Pascoal, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Joseph Therriault, Min Su Kang, Mélissa Savard, Sulantha Mathotaarachchi, Firoza Z Lussier, Cécile Tissot, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoxelPsychologyGrey matterNeuroscienceAudiologyWhite matterNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The Aggie Figures Learning Test (AFLT) is a memory test that was designed to be a visual analogue of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Previous studies have found associations between tau and amyloid PET and brain volume and RAVLT scores. However, to date, no study has explored the associations between these markers and AFLT scores. We aimed at exploring such associations. Methods Structural MRI, amyloid PET ([18F]‐NAV4694) and tau PET ([18F]‐MK6240) were acquired for 161 individuals. We conducted analyses on two sub‐samples. Demographic data is shown on Tables 1 and 2. MRI were segmented into probabilistic grey (GM) and white (WM) maps, non‐linearly registered to the ADNI template using Dartel and smoothed with an 8mm FWHM gaussian kernel. Voxel‐wise linear regression models were applied, using VoxelStats, with AFLT sub‐scores as dependent variables and either tau and amyloid binding or Voxel‐Based Morphometry as predictors. We corrected for sex, Apoe genotype, age and years of education. Results We found negative associations between tau binding and AFLT total (trials 1‐5) and AFLT delayed recall (DR) scores in the MTL and temporo‐occipital cortices, as well as in some of their WM tracts. These associations were stronger for the total scores and, in both cases, in the right hemisphere. For the amyloid biomarker, associations with AFLT total and AFLT DR scores were negative in right ventromedial PFC, right posterior thalamus and basal ganglia. In this case, strongest associations are reported between amyloid burden and AFLT DR scores. Finally, we found positive associations between AFLT total and DR scores and VBM in the fusiform gyrus bilaterally. Conclusions Results resemble previously reported findings on associations between RAVLT and tau, amyloid and brain volume estimates. Our findings are also in line with initial reporting of patients with right hemisphere damage having difficulties with AFLT tasks (Madjan, et al. 1996). In addition, relationships with tau tend to be more posterior, while relationships with amyloid were shown to be more anterior. Further analyses based on diagnostic categories are needed to explore how these associations change with pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation→French-language works237,207→