La construction du contemporain : Discours et pratiques du narratif au Québec et en France depuis 1980
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Etre contemporain c’est, au premier chef, etre de son temps (ou en avance sur lui) et produire une œuvre qui puisse etre recue parmi celles qui constituent le cœur vivant de la periode la plus actuelle. Cet ouvrage se penche sur la question du contemporain, aussi bien du point de vue du discours critique qui le definit que des pratiques litteraires qui s’y rattachent, en prenant pour objet le discours narratif tel qu’il s’est deploye au Quebec et en France depuis le tournant des annees 1980. Les auteurs rendent d’abord compte des themes et des mecanismes de valorisation qui marquent la critique litteraire, puis presentent des œuvres qui exemplifient certaines concretisations esthetiques et poetiques d’un nouvel art narratif. En se situant au confluent des reflexions francaises et quebecoises, ils font dialoguer ces deux corpus et tentent de repondre aux questions suivantes : la notion de contemporain designe-t-elle un meme phenomene en France et au Quebec ? Recoupe-t-elle la meme realite la-bas et ici ? Ces acceptions « nationales » se contaminent-elles, s’influencent-elles ? Entre vision panoramique et attention aux particularites des œuvres, cet ouvrage souleve des points de contact et de divergence entre les deux litteratures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".