SURG-12. PREDICTORS OF SURVIVAL AND UTILITY OF INTRAOPERATIVE MRI FOR RESECTION OF GRADE II ASTROCYTOMAS AND OLIGODENDROGLIOMAS: A MULTICENTER ANALYSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Few studies use large, multi-institutional patient cohorts to examine the role of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) in the resection of grade II gliomas. We assessed the impact of iMRI and other factors on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for newly-diagnosed grade II astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. METHODS Retrospective analyses of a multicenter database assessed the impact of patient-, treatment-, and tumor-related factors on OS/PFS. RESULTS 232 resections (112 astrocytomas, 120 oligodendrogliomas; 135 males; mean age 36.2 ± 0.9 years) were analyzed. Oligodendrogliomas had longer OS (p< 0.001) and PFS (p=0.009) than astrocytomas. Multivariate regression showed that extent of resection (EOR), including gross-total (GTR) versus near-total (NTR) resection (p=0.02, HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.25-.79) and GTR versus subtotal resection (STR) (p=0.006, HR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.08-0.66), was associated with longer OS. GTR versus NTR (p=0.04, HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-.85), GTR versus STR (p=0.02, HR: .54, 95% CI: .32-.91) and iMRI use (p=0.02, HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.32-0.92) were associated with longer PFS. Frontal (p=0.048, HR: 2.11, 95% CI: 1.01-4.43) and occipital/parietal (p=0.003, HR: 3.59, 95% CI: 1.52-8.49) locations were associated with shorter PFS (versus temporal). Kaplan-Meier analyses showed longer OS with increasing EOR (p=0.03) and 1p/19q gene deletions (p=0.02). PFS improved with increasing EOR (p=0.01), GTR versus NTR (p=0.02), and resections above STR (p=0.04). Factors influencing adjuvant treatment (35.3% of patients) included age (p=0.002, OR: 1.04) and EOR (p=0.037, OR: 0.41 for NTR versus STR; p=0.003, OR: 0.39 for GTR versus STR), but not glioma subtype or location, as determined by logistic regression. Additional tumor resection after iMRI was performed in 105/159 (66%) iMRI cases, yielding GTR in 54.5% of these cases. CONCLUSIONS EOR significantly improves OS and PFS for patients with grade II astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas. Intraoperative MRI may improve EOR and was associated with increased PFS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".