Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In many of the articles of this open issue, questions about the future meanings of sound and society prevail. The answers involve not only critiques of presentism but also concerns of a present with no future. In the first article that appears, Kai Arne Hansen asks, "In what ways does pop music made and performed by children contribute to environmental debate?," and finds that young activists have been at the forefront of public discourse about anthropogenic climate change. The theme of childhood experiences is also picked up in an article by Luiz Costa-Lima Neto, which we now republish in a translation into English by Tom Moore. Costa-Lima Neto suggests that composer Hermeto Pascoal's theorization of "Som da Aura" was rooted in his early experiences of hearing the spoken voice as sung melody. Costa-Lima Neto notes that Pascoal relates atonal sounds such as conversations and "pigs, geese, turkeys, chickens, ducks" to the everyday world around him. He also offers an exploration of what it means not only to hear the meaning of sounds differently from others but to also find compositional approaches to bridge ways of listening with others (enjoyably, Neto's journey through various methodologies to explain Pascoal's approach to composition is equally novel in its experimentation.)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it