MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111710464 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.259

GCT-41. RESPONSE-BASED RADIATION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM LOCALIZED GERMINOMA: A CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP (COG) PROSPECTIVE PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL

2020· article· en· W3111710464 on OpenAlexaff
Ute Bartels, Jason Fangusaro, Dennis Shaw, Aashim Bhatia, Arzu Omar-Thomas, Shengjie Wu, S. MacDonald, Erin S. Murphy, Mark M. Souweidane, Maryam Fouladi, Amar Gajjar, Girish Dhall, Soumen Khatua

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCogCarboplatinEtoposideGerminomaChemotherapyRadiation therapyPhases of clinical researchInternal medicineCentral nervous systemSurgeryOncologyGastroenterologyCisplatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND The objective of stratum 2 of COG ACNS1123 was to evaluate children and young adults (3–21 years) with localized central nervous system (CNS) germinoma and investigate whether simplified pre-irradiation chemotherapy followed by response based dose-reduced whole ventricular irradiation (WVI) would maintain a high progression-free survival (PFS) while reducing long term treatment burden. METHODS Pre-irradiation chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of carboplatin and etoposide every 21 days followed by response-based irradiation (XRT). Patients with a complete response (CR) to pre-XRT chemotherapy received 18Gy WVI + 12Gy boost to the tumor bed. Patients with partial response (PR) but less than 1.5 cm residual proceeded to 24Gy WVI + 12Gy boost. All patients were also enrolled on COG ALTE07C1 to prospectively evaluate and longitudinally model the cognitive, social and behavioral functioning. RESULTS During a total accrual time of 45.5 months from 05/2012 to 06/2018, 137 eligible patients were enrolled. Median age was 14.09 years (4.95–21.46), 73% were male, and 45.26% had elevated βhCG in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid. Twenty-nine patients (21.17%) did not have tissue biopsy. Eleven patients underwent second-look surgery; 7 had mature teratoma and 4 had non-viable tumor. Eighty-one patients (59.13%) had a CR. There were 4 relapses in patients receiving 18Gy WVI + boost, but no deaths. No unexpected treatment-related events were observed. The estimated 3-year PFS was 94.4 ±2.7% among 74 evaluable subjects. CONCLUSION This study shows promise in XRT reduction for patients with localized CNS germinoma and CR. Long-term survival outcomes and ALTE07C1 data are being evaluated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207