Hybrid heat sinks for thermal management of <scp>passively cooled</scp> battery chargers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Battery chargers are an important component in electric and plug‐in hybrid vehicles and various other clean energy systems. The thermal management in battery charger is a crucial aspect that influences its overall performance and cyclic stability. Passive cooling technology using heat sinks is preferred in developing battery chargers due to its reliability, quietness, and efficiency (no parasitic power). In the present work, new hybrid passive heat sinks (HPHS) with various fin geometries, namely inclined interrupted fins, pin fins, and straight interrupted fins, have been developed by adding a phase change material (PCM) layer to passively cooled bare fin heat sinks (BFHS). The developed heat sinks have the same geometric footprint as that of the battery charger, IC650 built by the industrial partner of the project Delta‐Q Technologies. Experimental investigations were carried out to analyze the effects of PCM quantities and continuous (80‐120 W) and intermittent (duty cycle operation) thermal loads on the heating‐cooling performance of the HPHS. Temperature contours obtained using infrared images show that the proposed HPHS provides a more uniform temperature with reduced hot spots compared to BFHS. The heating and cooling performances of straight interrupted fins‐based HPHS were found better for all thermal loads and PCM quantities tested due to their smaller thermal resistance. Increasing the PCM volume fraction from 0.2 to 0.6 improves the load shedding capacity. However, the added thermal resistance requires optimal consideration. While conducting different cyclic operations for inclined interrupted fins‐based HPHS, a maximum overall thermal management ratio of 0.45 was achieved. The proposed HPHS minimizes the temperature fluctuations more effectively while operating at high loads and shorter duty periods. This new passively cooled hybrid heat sink can notably improve the overall performance and reliability of battery chargers during both continuous and intermittent operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".