Further Investigation into the Biochemical Effects of Phosphorylation of Tropomyosin Tpm1.1(α). Serine-283 Is in Communication with the Midregion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of tropomyosin Tpm1.1(α) are prepared from adult rabbit heart and compared biochemically. Electrophoresis confirms the high level of enrichment of the chromatography fractions and is consistent with a single site of phosphorylation. Covalently bound phosphate groups at position 283 of Tpm1.1(α) increase the rate of digestion at Leu-169, suggestive of a conformational rearrangement that extends to the midregion. Such a rearrangement, which is supported by ellipticity measurements between 25 and 42 °C, is consistent with a phosphorylation-mediated tightening of the interaction between various myofilament components. In a nonradioactive, co-sedimentation assay [30 mM KCl, 1 mM Mg(II), and 4 °C], phosphorylated Tpm1.1(α) displays a higher affinity for F-actin compared to that of the unphosphorylated control ( K d, 0.16 μM vs 0.26 μM). Phosphorylation decreases the concentration of thin filaments (pCa 4 plus ATP) required to attain a half-maximal rate of release of product from a pre-power stroke complex [myosin-S1-2-deoxy-3- O -( N -methylanthraniloyl)ADP-P i ], as investigated by double-mixing stopped-flow fluorescence, suggestive of a change in the proportion of active (turned on) and inactive (turned off) conformers, but similar maximum rates of product release are observed with either type of reconstituted thin filament. Phosphorylated thin filaments (pCa 4 and 8) display a higher affinity for myosin-S1(ADP) versus the control scenario without affecting isotherm steepness. Specific activities of ATP and Tpm1.1(α) are determined during an in vitro incubation of rat cardiac tissue [12 day-old, 50% phosphorylated Tpm1.1(α)] with [ 32 P]orthophosphate. The incorporation of an isotope into tropomyosin lags behind that of ATP by a factor of approximately 10, indicating that transfer is a comparatively slow process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".