MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3111804892 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.346

IMG-10. MRI-BASED RADIOMIC PROGNOSTIC MARKERS OF DIFFUSE MIDLINE GLIOMA

2020· article· en· W3111804892 on OpenAlexaff
Lydia Tam, Michelle Han, Jason N. Wright, Sebastian Toescu, Andrew Campion, Katie Shpanskaya, Kshitij Mankad, Chang Yueh Ho, Robert M. Lober, Samuel Cheshier, Darren Hargrave, Tom Jacques, Kristian Aquilina, Michelle Monje, Gerald A. Grant, Sarah A. Mattonen, Nick Vitanza, Kristen W. Yeom

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRadiomicsGray levelProportional hazards modelConcordanceArtificial intelligenceRadiologyNuclear medicineInternal medicineComputer scienceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse midline gliomas (DMG) are lethal pediatric brain tumors with dismal prognoses. Presently, MRI is the mainstay of disease diagnosis and surveillance. We aimed to identify prognostic image-based radiomics markers of DMG and compare its performance to clinical variables at presentation. METHODS 104 treatment-naïve DMG MRIs from five centers were used (median age=6.5yrs; 18 males, median OS=11mos). We isolated tumor volumes of T1-post-contrast (T1gad) and T2-weighted (T2) MRI for PyRadiomics high-dimensional feature extraction. 900 features were extracted on each image, including first order statistics, 2D/3D Shape, Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix, Gray Level Run Length Matrix, Gray Level Size Zone Matrix, Neighboring Gray tone Difference Matrix, and Gray Level Dependence Matrix, as defined by Imaging Biomarker Standardization Initiative. Overall survival (OS) served as outcome. 10-fold cross-validation of LASSO Cox regression was used to predict OS. We analyzed model performance using clinical variable (age at diagnosis and sex) only, radiomics only, and radiomics plus clinical variable. Concordance metric was used to assess the Cox model. RESULTS Nine radiomic features were selected from T1gad (2 texture wavelet) and T2 (5 first-order features (1 original, 4 wavelet), 2 texture features (1 wavelet, 1 log-sigma). This model demonstrated significantly higher performance than a clinical model alone (C: 0.68 vs 0.59, p<0.001). Adding clinical features to radiomic features slightly improved prediction, but was not significant (C=0.70, p=0.06). CONCLUSION Our pilot study shows a potential role for MRI-based radiomics and machine learning for DMG risk stratification and as image-based biomarkers for clinical therapy trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207