Structural and binding characterization of the LacdiNAc-specific adhesin (LabA; HopD) exodomain from Helicobacter pylori
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) uses several outer membrane proteins for adhering to its host's gastric mucosa, an important step in establishing and preserving colonization. Several adhesins (SabA, BabA, HopQ) have been characterized in terms of their three-dimensional structure. A recent addition to the growing list of outer membrane porins is LabA (LacdiNAc-binding adhesin), which is thought to bind specifically to GalNAcβ1-4GlcNAc, occurring in the gastric mucosa. LabA47-496 protein expressed as His-tagged protein in the periplasm of E. coli and purified via subtractive IMAC after TEV cleavage and subsequent size exclusion chromatography, resulted in bipyramidal crystals with good diffraction properties. Here, we describe the 2.06 Å resolution structure of the exodomain of LabA from H. pylori strain J99 (PDB ID: 6GMM). Strikingly, despite the relatively low levels of sequence identity with the other three structurally characterized adhesins (20–49%), LabA shares an L-shaped fold with SabA and BabA. The ‘head’ region contains a 4 + 3 α-helix bundle, with a small insertion domain consisting of a short antiparallel beta sheet and an unstructured region, not resolved in the crystal structure. Sequence alignment of LabA from different strains shows a high level of conservation in the N- and C-termini, and identifies two main types based on the length of the insertion domain (‘crown’ region), the ‘J99-type’ (insertion ~31 amino acids), and the H. pylori ‘26695 type’ (insertion ~46 amino acids). Analysis of ligand binding using Native Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (ESI-MS) together with solid phase-bound, ELISA-type assays could not confirm the originally described binding of GalNAcβ1-4GlcNAc-containing oligosaccharides, in line with other recent reports, which also failed to confirm LacdiNAc binding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".