A qualitative study of the experiences of male and female spousal and adult children caregivers across the caregiving trajectory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Caregiving is not static and changes across the illness trajectory. Our first research objective was to determine phases of caregiving throughout the Alzheimer’s disease trajectory. Our second objective was to explore the similarities and differences in the experiences of male and female adult children and spousal caregivers to persons with Alzheimer’s disease over time. Method We applied a constructivist grounded theory approach to data collection and analysis. Forty spousal (10 husbands+ 10 wives) and adult children (10 sons+ 10 daughters) caregivers to persons with Alzheimer’s disease were recruited and interviewed using a semi‐structured interview guide. Result We identified 5 phases reflecting caregiving roles related to: 1) monitoring initial symptoms, 2) navigating diagnosis, 3) assisting with instrumental activities of daily living, 4) assisting with basic activities of daily living, and 5) preparing for the future. We were not able to identify any differences by gender or relationship in the caregiving phases. However, our results suggest that when looking at the experiences of caregiving from a gender‐and‐relationship lens experiences across the phases become complex and variable. For instance, spousal caregivers approach a dementia diagnosis with denial, with wives being optimistic for a slow progression of the disease for long periods of time. Adult children caregivers are concerned about the ways the caregiving role will impact their personal and career obligations and seek ways to mitigate the changes to their daily lives. Male caregivers largely utilize home and community health services to assist with personal care tasks whereas female caregivers utilize the same services to allow them to complete other caregiving tasks. Conclusion We identified five distinct phases of caregiving and revealed that gender and relationship influence caregiving experiences across the Alzheimer’s disease trajectory. Recognition of the differential impact of gender and relationship on caregiving can inform future intervention efforts by suggesting ways to tailor interventions based upon gender and/or relationship to best support caregivers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".