A simple estimate of axon size with diffusion MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Noninvasive estimation of mean axon diameter presents a new opportunity to explore white matter plasticity, development, and pathology. Several diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) methods have been proposed to measure the average axon diameter in white matter, but they typically require many diffusion encoding measurements and complicated mathematical models to fit the signal to multiple tissue compartments, including intra- and extra-axonal spaces. Here, Monte Carlo simulations uncovered a straightforward DW-MRI metric of axon diameter: the change in radial apparent diffusion coefficient estimated at different effective diffusion times, ΔD⊥. Simulations indicated that this metric increases monotonically within a relevant range of effective mean axon diameter while being insensitive to changes in extra-axonal volume fraction, axon diameter distribution, g-ratio, and influence of myelin water. Also, a monotonic relationship was found to exist for signals coming from both intra- and extra-axonal compartments. The slope in ΔD⊥ with effective axon diameter increased with the difference in diffusion time of both oscillating and pulsed gradient diffusion sequences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".