LTBK-04. PHASE 2 MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ONCOLYTIC ADENOVIRUS DNX-2401 (TASADENOTUREV) IN COMBINATION WITH PEMBROLIZUMAB FOR RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA; CAPTIVE STUDY (KEYNOTE-192)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND A Phase 2 multi-center study was conducted to evaluate the replication-competent oncolytic adenovirus, DNX-2401 (tasadenoturev), in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab, in subjects with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS Subjects ≥ 18 years with glioblastoma at first or second recurrence were treated with a single intratumoral injection of 5e8-5e10 vp DNX-2401 at the time of biopsy, followed by 200 mg pembrolizumab infusions every 3 weeks until progression or toxicity. RESULTS Forty-nine subjects were enrolled at first (79.6%) or second (20.4%) recurrence after prior surgery (89.8%), radiotherapy (100%), and temozolomide (100%). Forty-eight of 49 (98%) were treated with 5e8 vp (n=3), 5e9 vp (n=3), or 5e10 vp (n=42) DNX-2401 and pembrolizumab. Median treatment duration was 7 cycles (range 1–35) with one subject remaining on treatment (cycle 31). Adverse events were primarily mild to moderate, consistent with underlying disease, and manageable. Headache, brain edema, and fatigue are the most common events reported as related to the treatment regimen. Of subjects treated with full dose DNX-2401 and pembrolizumab (n=42), 5 subjects (11.9%) had confirmed responses, including 2 durable ongoing complete responses and 3 partial responses. One subject remains tumor free > 12 months after completing the planned 24 months of pembrolizumab. Median overall survival was 12.5 months; OS-12 and OS-18 were 54.5% and 20.8%, respectively. Four subjects, all of which have survived more than 21 months, continue to be followed for survival. CONCLUSIONS DNX-2401 plus pembrolizumab provides encouraging activity and is safe in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. A global, randomized, controlled Phase 3 study is planned.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".