MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112033076 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.428

LGG-50. INTEGRATED MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ANALYSIS OF 1,000 PEDIATRIC LOW-GRADE GLIOMAS UNCOVERS NOVEL SUBGROUPS FOR CLINICAL RISK STRATIFICATION

2020· article· en· W3112033076 on OpenAlexaff
Uri Tabori, Scott Ryall, Michal Zápotocký, Julie Bennett, Liana Nobre, David W. Ellison, Mariarita Santi, Matthias A. Karajannis, Cynthia Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIDH1Risk stratificationMedicineInternal medicineCohortOncologyHistologyGastroenterologyPathologyMutationBiologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG) are primarily driven by genetic alterations in the RAS/MAPK pathway, most commonly involving BRAF of NF1. Despite their molecular convergence, pLGG often show unexplained variability in their clinical outcome. To address this, we molecularly characterized a cohort of >1,000 clinically annotated pLGG. 84% of cases harbored a detectable driver mutation. The remaining 16% of patients nonetheless showed RAS/MAPK pathway up-regulation at the RNA level. The clinical presentation and outcome of pLGG appeared highly variable and linked to the alteration type: re-arrangement or SNV. Re-arrangement-driven tumors were diagnosed at a younger age (6.6 versus 10.9 years, p<0.0001), enriched for WHO grade I histology (88% versus 66%, p<0.0001), infrequently progressed (27% versus 46%, p<0.0001), and rarely resulted in death (3 versus 13%, p<0.0001) as compared to SNV-driven tumors. These included the rarest molecular drivers of pLGG, for which we now have the clinicopathologic features of including MYB, MYBL1, FGFR2 fusions, FGFR1-TACC1, FGFR1 SNVs, IDH1 p.R132H, and H3.3 p.K27M. Utilizing this information, we suggest novel risk categories of pLGG that effectively predicted patient outcome. Low-risk tumors progressed infrequently and rarely succumbed to their disease (10-year PFS of 71% and OS of 98%). Intermediate-risk pLGG had a 10-year PFS and OS of 35% and 90%, respectively. High risk pLGG almost invariably progressed (10-year PFS of 0%) and these patients often succumbed to their disease (10-year OS of 41%). These data highlight the biological and clinical differences between pLGG subtypes and offers molecular based risk stratification to these cancers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207