MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112039982 · doi:10.1002/alz.045098

APOE4 packs a punch in women: Sex‐specific vulnerability for tau and neuroinflammation

2020· article· en· W3112039982 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yi‐Ting Wang, Min Su Kang, Joseph Therriault, Tharick A. Pascoal, Firoza Z Lussier, Mélissa Savard, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Cécile Tissot, Jaime Fernández Arias, Serge Gauthier, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolipoprotein ENeuropathologyAtrophyNeuroinflammationMicrogliaInternal medicineMedicineDementiaPsychologyRisk factorHippocampusDiseaseEndocrinologyInflammation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The role that sex plays in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has long been the subject of intense investigation. Considerable amount of literatures showed a disproportionally high prevalence of AD in women. Moreover, sex differences were observed in disease manifestation, rates of cognitive decline, cerebral atrophy, as well as the response to treatments, suggesting that sex serves as a crucial factor in the disease heterogeneity. APOE is the strongest genetic risk factor for sporadic AD, with the ε4 allele conferring increased risk. It was found that female ε4 carriers show stronger risk for clinical AD. Other studies showed that female ε4 carriers have higher p‐tau levels in cerebrospinal fluid and show worse memories than male ε4 carriers. Despite evidence supports APOE has a stronger association among women compared with men, limited work has evaluated the effects of ApoE4 on AD core neuropathology including amyloid, tau and microglial activation in a sex‐specific manner. Method This was a cross‐sectional study in APOE ε4 carriers with AD (n=31), MCI (n=23), cognitively normal controls (n=47) and young healthy controls (n=9) from the TRIAD study at McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Canada. Cerebral amyloid load, tau neurofibrillary tangles and microglia activation were assessed using positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals [18F]AZD4694 ([18F]NAV4694), [18F]MK6240 and [11C]PBR28 respectively. Result No significant difference was found in age, education and MMSE score between male and female subjects. Female ε4 carriers showed significant higher tau burden in hippocampus (P<0.01), entorhinal cortex (P<0.05) and parahippocampal cortex (P<0.05) compared to male ε4 carriers. A sex‐specific vulnerability for tau and neuroinflammation was observed. More specifically, in amyloid‐positive female ε4 carriers, higher tau burden was found to be strongly associated with worse cognitive function assessed by Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). In addition, an positive correlation between amyloid load and microglial activation level was also identified in female APOE ε4 carriers. Conclusion We provide striking evidence that female is more vulnerable for the effects of APOE ε4 on tau and neuroinflammation, suggesting APOE may modulate AD pathology in a sex‐specific manner, particularly in the presence of amyloidosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207