An Improved Asymmetric Hurricane Parametric Model Based on Cross-Polarization SAR Observations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) has been proven to be a useful tool in monitoring hurricane structure and intensity. By far, SAR is the most promising spaceborne sensor to obtain high-resolution hurricane wind field on the ocean surface. In this article, an improved asymmetric hurricane parametric (IMAHP) model has been proposed to reconstruct the asymmetric wind speed, where the high-resolution cross-polarization SAR imagery is used to determine the value of model parameters. Compared with other models, the new model can better reconstruct hurricane wind speed with a more concise model function. For verification, taking SAR-retrieved wind speed as a reference, the root-mean-square error and bias of the wind speed estimated by the IMAHP model are 1.86 m/s, 1.89 m/s for Hurricane Arthur (2014), 2.01 m/s, 1.77 m/s for Iselle (2014), and 1.99 m/s, 1.74 m/s for Norbert (2014), respectively. Finally, comparisons with airborne stepped-frequency microwave radiometer and dropwindsondes measurements show that the wind speed simulated by the IMAHP model is close to these measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".