MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112102990 · doi:10.1002/alz.041129

Overview of dominantly inherited AD and top‐line DIAN‐TU results of solanezumab and gantenerumab

2020· article· en· W3112102990 on OpenAlexaff
Randall J. Bateman, Andrew J. Aschenbrenner, Tammie L.S. Benzinger, David B. Clifford, Kelley A. Coalier, Carlos Cruchaga, Anne M. Fagan, Martin R. Farlow, Alison Goate, Brian A. Gordon, Jason Hassenstab, Clifford R. Jack, Robert A. Koeppe, Eric McDade, Susan Mills, John C. Morris, Stephen Salloway, Anna Santacruz, Peter J. Snyder, Guoqiao Wang, Chengjie Xiong, B. Joy Snider, Catherine J. Mummery, Ghulam M. Surti, Didier Hannequin, David Wallon, Sarah Berman, James J. Lah, Ivonne Z. Jiménez‐Velázquez, Erik D. Roberson, Christopher H. van Dyck, Lawrence S. Honig, Raquel Sánchez‐Valle, William S. Brooks, Serge Gauthier, Colin L. Masters, Doug Galasko, Jared R. Brosch, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung, Suman Jayadev, Maïté Formaglio, Mario Masellis, Roger Clarnette, Jérémie Pariente, Bruno Dubois, Florence Pasquier, Scott W. Andersen, Karen C. Holdridge, Mark A. Mintun, John R. Sims, R. Yaari, Monika Baudler, Paul Delmar, Rachelle S. Doody, Paulo Fontoura, Geoffrey A. Kerchner

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDosingRandomized controlled trialPopulationClinical trialOncologyPersonalized medicineInternal medicineBioinformaticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) prevention trials aim to intervene prior to significant neuronal loss, brain damage, and symptom onset to delay or slow cognitive decline. In dominantly inherited AD (DIAD), mutation carriers develop symptomatic AD at predictable ages with near 100% penetrance. In 2012, the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer Network Trials Unit Adaptive Prevention Trial (DIAN‐TU APT) platform launched a double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel group trial of two anti‐amyloid‐beta monoclonal antibodies with two different antigenic targets, gantenerumab and solanezumab (NCT01760005). The DIAN‐TU scientific development, implementation of the first AD prevention trial, trial challenges and opportunities, including dose escalation, and top‐line results will be presented. Method DIAN was established in 2008 in response to a call from the National Institute of Aging to establish a network to study DIAD and enable future clinical trials. Successive breakthroughs in understanding disease processes enabled the launch of the DIAN‐TU adaptive prevention trial, a global adaptive platform trial supporting testing multiple drugs in parallel. The DIAN‐TU partners include patients and families at risk for DIAD, global academic researchers, the NIH, Alzheimer’s Association, philanthropic supporters, the DIAN‐TU Pharma Consortium, and pharmaceutical companies with drugs being tested. Important milestones include developing a platform to enable a comprehensive efficient treatment trial for this rare population, adding tau PET as part of AMP AD, adapting dosing mid‐trial and extending the original biomarker trial to continue randomized dosing to test a cognitive endpoint until the last patient reaches 4 years, developing a disease progression statistical model and inclusion of DIAN observational data to increase the power to determine drug effects. Result The primary and key secondary outcomes of the DIAN‐TU trial will be presented for each therapy in the context of targeting amyloid‐beta at pre‐clinical and clinically symptomatic stages of disease. Conclusion These results inform about AD hypotheses, timing of treatment and the prospect of slowing, or preventing AD in DIAD and sporadic AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207