MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3112144261 · doi:10.1002/alz.047338

Extracellular cardiolipin modulates glial phagocytosis and cytokine secretion in a toll‐like receptor 4‐dependent manner

2020· article· en· W3112144261 on OpenAlexaff
Tyler J. Wenzel, Athena L. Ranger, Taryn E. Murray, Seamus A. McRae, Andis Klegeris

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrogliaCell biologyNeuroinflammationExtracellularBiologyNeurotrophic factorsToll-like receptorAstrocyteTumor necrosis factor alphaReceptorImmune systemChemistryInnate immune systemInflammationImmunologyBiochemistryEndocrinologyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cardiolipin (CL) is a mitochondrial membrane phospholipid that acts as a signaling molecule when released into the extracellular space from degenerating and dying brain cells. Previous research has shown that extracellular CL inhibits secretion of pro‐inflammatory mediators by immune‐activated microglia. CL alone also increases the phagocytic activity of microglia and upregulates their expression of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and glial cell‐derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). The mechanisms by which CL modulates microglia functions, in a manner that is potentially beneficial in Alzheimer’s disease, are unknown. Furthermore, the effects of CL on astrocytes have not been explored. Since microglia and astrocytes express toll‐like receptor (TLR) 4, we hypothesized that extracellular CL interacts with this receptor, modulating immune functions of glia. Method We studied the effects of CL applied to the culture media on select functions of primary murine microglia and astrocytes, BV‐2 murine microglia, U118 MG human astrocytoma cells, and THP‐1 human microglia‐like cells. Secretion of inflammatory cytokines was monitored by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunoblotting. The phagocytic activity of primary microglia and astrocytes was measured with fluorescent latex microspheres. The internalization of the microspheres was verified using confocal microscopy. Result Extracellular CL (0.4‐14 μM) alone upregulates the phagocytic activity and release of monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)‐1 by murine microglia and human astrocytic cells. TLR 4‐specific antagonist TAK‐242 and blocking antibodies inhibit the upregulated phagocytic activity and MCP‐1 secretion by CL‐treated microglia and human THP‐1 microglia‐like cells. CL increases the secretion of interferon (IFN) γ‐induced protein (IP)‐10 and IFN‐β by THP‐1 microglia‐like cells and human U118 MG astrocytoma cells, respectively. CL inhibits the secretion of cytotoxins by several types of activated microglia and astrocytes. Amyloid β (Aβ42) peptide‐ and lipopolysaccharide‐induced secretion of cytokines by primary murine microglia and U118 MG astrocytoma cells, respectively, is reduced by extracellular CL. Conclusion Extracellular CL can interact with TLR 4 to modulate select functions of microglia and astrocytes. Importantly, we demonstrate that CL inhibits amyloid‐β peptide‐induced secretion of inflammatory cytokines by microglia and reduces glia‐mediated neuron death. Therefore, CL or liposomes containing CL could be developed as potential therapeutic agents for Alzheimer’s disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→