MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112147508 · doi:10.3138/md.63.4.1059

Jewish Immigrant Theatre and the Argentinean Avant-Gardes: The Case of <i>Ibergus</i> in 1926 Buenos Aires

2020· article· en· W3112147508 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
C. Tova Markenson

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Drama · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJudaismYiddishImmigrationSociologyHistoryLiteratureArtArt historyGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 1926 production of Yiddish playwright Leib Malakh’s Ibergus, a naturalistic play featuring a Jewish prostitute, has been interpreted as the culmination of Jewish immigrant efforts to “cleanse” the Argentinean Yiddish theatres of their supposed proprietors: a ring of Jewish pimps. Scholars focus on how Ibergus, directed using avant-gardist staging techniques by Yakov Botoshansky, contested the influence of the Jewish prostitution ring, which allegedly insisted that Yiddish impresarios produce a “lowbrow” repertoire rather than modernist plays. This essay offers a new understanding of the significance of Ibergus by arguing that it continued a longstanding trend of avant-garde Yiddish theatre in Buenos Aires and within transnational performance networks. By attending to multiple dimensions of this production – including the surrounding intra-ethnic conflict, construction of public discourse, and staging elements – I show how the creators of Ibergus exploited dominant assumptions about the Yiddish theatre’s rumoured relationship to prostitution for their own professional gain. Doing so reveals the significance of Ibergus in the history and theorization of the theatrical avant-gardes and contributes to conversations about the relationship between discourse and practice in global theatre histories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern DramaSame topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207