Human-in-the-Loop Control of a Wearable Lower Limb Exoskeleton for Stable Dynamic Walking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exoskeletons are increasingly used to assist humans in military, industry, and healthcare applications, thereby enabling individuals to gain increased strength and endurance. This article proposes a novel human-in-the-loop control framework for a fully actuated lower limb exoskeleton with high degree-of-freedoms (DoFs), allowing users to walk without crutches or other external stabilization tools. To imitate the natural lower limb motion of users, a novel barrier energy function is utilized for the design of the control strategy, where the human-robot manipulation space is reformulated as a human-voluntary and a robot-constrained region. The variations in the barrier energy function are based on the distance between the center of mass and zero moment point of the walking exoskeleton, thereby constraining the lower limb motion of the user to a compliant region around various desired trajectories. Based on varying regional functions, the proposed strategy is designed to control the exoskeleton to follow appropriate ergonomic trajectories. For such a purpose, an adaptive controller is exploited considering the functions of the human effort and the robot's capabilities simultaneously, and a smooth motion transition can be achieved between the human and robot regions. Finally, physical experiments are conducted on a ten-DoFs walking exoskeleton to validate the stability and robustness of the proposed control framework with subjects performing flat walking, turning, and obstacle avoidance movements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".