MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3112165963 · doi:10.1002/alz.037300

Effects of APOE4 on Alzheimer’s disease, Lewy body disease, cerebral amyloid deposition and cognitive dysfunction

2020· article· en· W3112165963 on OpenAlexaff
Jin Ho Jung, Seong Ho Jeong, Seun Jeon, Kyoungwon Baik, Yang Hyun Lee, Seok Jong Chung, Han Soo Yoo, Young H. Sohn, Phil Hyu Lee, Byoung Seok Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLewy bodyAlzheimer's diseasePsychologyApolipoprotein EPittsburgh compound BDementia with Lewy bodiesDementiaCognitionDiseaseMedicineInternal medicineNeurosciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background We investigated the effects of apolipoprotein E e4 allele (APOE4) on the risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and/or Lewy body disease (LBD), cerebral amyloid deposition, and cognitive dysfunction. Method We consecutively recruited 131 control subjects and 208 (110 non‐demented and 98 demented) patients with AD and/or LBD. Patients were categorized into typical AD (pure AD and Lewy body variant of AD), typical LBD (pure LBD and LBD with amyloid deposition), and typical AD with LBD based on clinical features and biomarker evidence from 18F‐Florbetaben (FBB) positron emission tomography (PET) and dopamine transporter PET. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate whether APOE4 increased the risk for each disease. General linear models (GLMs) were performed to investigate the independent and interaction effects of APOE4, typical AD and typical LBD on cerebral FBB deposition, cross‐sectional cognition and the rate of longitudinal cognitive decline. Result APOE4 increased the risk of pure AD, AD with DLB, Lewy body variant of AD, and DLB with amyloid deposition, but did not increase the risk of pure LBD. In overall participants, APOE4 increased the risk of typical AD, but not typical LBD. APOE4, typical AD and typical LBD were positively associated with occipital FBB deposition; typical LBD was associated with higher occipital FBB deposition in the absence of typical AD; and APOE4 was associated with higher occipital FBB deposition in the presence of typical LBD. In GLMs for cross‐sectional cognition, APOE4 was associated with lower scores in verbal memory tests and higher clinical dementia rating sum of boxes (CDR‐SOB); it was associated with higher CDR‐SOB in the presence of typical LBD and lower scores in verbal memory tests in the presence of typical AD. APOE4 had no significant effects on the rates of longitudinal cognitive changes. Conclusion APOE4 is associated with increased risks of AD and amyloid deposition but not with LBD. APOE4 and typical LBD are independently and synergistically associated with occipital amyloid deposition. APOE4 interacts with typical AD on poor memory function and interacts with typical LBD on higher CDR‐SOB cross‐sectionally, but did not have significant effects on longitudinal cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→