MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112220912 · doi:10.22331/q-2022-05-24-721

Numerical Implementation of Just-In-Time Decoding in Novel Lattice Slices Through the Three-Dimensional Surface Code

2022· article· en· W3112220912 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilAustralian Research CouncilMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesUniversity College LondonGovernment of CanadaInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueCompute Canada
KeywordsDecoding methodsLattice (music)Code (set theory)Dimension (graph theory)AlgorithmSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceSurface (topology)Bounded functionMathematicsGeometryCombinatoricsMathematical analysisPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We build on recent work by B. Brown (Sci. Adv. 6, eaay4929 (2020)) to develop and simulate an explicit recipe for a just-in-time decoding scheme in three 3D surface codes, which can be used to implement a transversal (non-Clifford) <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo accent="false">&amp;#x00AF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math> between three 2D surface codes in time linear in the code distance. We present a fully detailed set of bounded-height lattice slices through the 3D codes which retain the code distance and measurement-error detecting properties of the full 3D code and admit a dimension-jumping process which expands from/collapses to 2D surface codes supported on the boundaries of each slice. At each timestep of the procedure the slices agree on a common set of overlapping qubits on which <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math> should be applied. We use these slices to simulate the performance of a simple JIT decoder against stochastic <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math> and measurement errors and find evidence for a threshold <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&amp;#x223C;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">&amp;#x0025;</mml:mi></mml:math> in all three codes. We expect that this threshold could be improved by optimisation of the decoder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it