Numerical Implementation of Just-In-Time Decoding in Novel Lattice Slices Through the Three-Dimensional Surface Code
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We build on recent work by B. Brown (Sci. Adv. 6, eaay4929 (2020)) to develop and simulate an explicit recipe for a just-in-time decoding scheme in three 3D surface codes, which can be used to implement a transversal (non-Clifford) C C Z ¯ between three 2D surface codes in time linear in the code distance. We present a fully detailed set of bounded-height lattice slices through the 3D codes which retain the code distance and measurement-error detecting properties of the full 3D code and admit a dimension-jumping process which expands from/collapses to 2D surface codes supported on the boundaries of each slice. At each timestep of the procedure the slices agree on a common set of overlapping qubits on which C C Z should be applied. We use these slices to simulate the performance of a simple JIT decoder against stochastic X and measurement errors and find evidence for a threshold p c ∼ 0.1 % in all three codes. We expect that this threshold could be improved by optimisation of the decoder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".