3-D Large-Pitch Synthetic Transmit Aperture Imaging With a Reduced Number of Measurement Channels: A Feasibility Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 3-D synthetic transmit aperture ultrasound imaging system with a fully addressed array usually leads to high hardware complexity and cost since each element in the array is individually controlled. To reduce the hardware complexity, we had presented the large-pitch synthetic transmit aperture (LPSTA) ultrasound imaging for 2-D imaging using a 1-D phased array to reduce the number of measurement channels M (the product of number of transmissions, [Formula: see text], and the number of receiving channels in each transmission, [Formula: see text]). In this article, we extend this method to a 2-D matrix array for 3-D imaging. We present both numerical simulations and experimental measurements. We combined L × L adjacent elements into transmission subapertures (SAP) and K × K adjacent elements into receive SAPs in synthetic transmit aperture (STA) imaging. In the image reconstruction, we conducted the first attempt to apply and integrate Gaussian-approximated spatial response function (G-SRF) with delay and sum (DAS) to improve the image contrast, especially for the near-field targets. The imaging performance obtained from G-SRF was also evaluated numerically and compared with the previously presented frequency-domain SRF (Freq-domain SRF). The 3-D large-pitch synthetic transmit aperture (3-D-LPSTA) with G-SRF can provide a computationally efficient solution compared with the standard 3-D-STA method. With approximately 1900-fold reduction in the number of measurement channels, 3-D-LPSTA can provide image contrast comparable with the standard 3-D-STA with a full array and significantly better than using a periodically sparse array with similar complexity. In addition to reducing the system complexity, the 3-D-LPSTA achieves 700-fold reduction in computational complexity and 523-fold reduction in data storage. Finally, we evaluated and implemented the G-SRF using phantom data, which were consistent with the simulation results showing that the G-SRF can improve the image contrast. The results demonstrate that the proposed 3-D-LPSTA shows the great potential for designing an inexpensive ultrasound system to ensure the real-time 3-D clinical ultrasound imaging using large arrays. The limits of the proposed method were also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".