MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3112277769 · doi:10.1002/alz.041433

The association between ambient air pollution and cognitive impairment in community‐dwelling older adults: Six‐year cohort study TIGER

2020· article· en· W3112277769 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shu‐Ping Tsao, Jen‐Hau Chen, Hwa‐Lung Yu, Jeng‐Min Chiou, Ta‐Fu Chen, Liang‐Chuan Lai, Yen‐Ching Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionEnvironmental healthMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPsychologyMedicineCognitive impairmentPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ambient air pollution exposure has been related to cognitive impairment. Several studies have started to explore the association of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides with cognitive impairment, studies evaluated the effect of long‐term exposure to ozone(O3), carbon monoxide (CO) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) are sparse. Method This study is part of the ongoing Taiwan Initiative for Geriatric Epidemiological Research (TIGER). A total of 605 participants (Age 65+) were recruited from a teaching hospital in northern Taiwan in 2011 and followed up biennially. After exclusion and loss to follow‐up over 6 years, a total of 292 participants were included for analyses. Global cognition was assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment‐Taiwanese version; domain‐specific cognition (logical memory, attention, verbal fluency, and executive function) were assessed by a battery of neuropsychological tests. The data of three air pollutants (O3, CO and SO2) were obtained from 27 monitor stations of Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) between 1993 and 2010. Air pollutants were tertiled into low, moderate, and high levels. Spatial‐Time Analysis Rendering with Bayesian Maximum Entropy was utilized to establish the spatial‐temporal model. Logistic regression model was utilized to assess the association of exposure to air pollutants and global or domain‐specific cognition over 6 years adjusting for important covariates. Result The 17‐year average level was 39.40ppb for 8‐hour O3, 1.47ppm for 8‐hour CO, and 4.70ppb for daily SO2, which were below the EPA standards. Exposure to high‐level O3 (>40.83 ppb) was associated with poor executive function [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=2.14, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.05‐4.35] compared with low‐level O3. No significant association was observed between O3 or CO and global cognition or other cognitive domains. SO2 were not associated with cognitive function over 6 years. Conclusion Long‐term (17 years) exposure to O3, CO and SO2 lower than the EPA standards showed significant association with cognitive domains in a 6‐year cohort of community‐dwelling older adults. Future revisions of air standards may need to consider epidemiologic studies exploring the relation between exposure to these air pollutants and cognitive impairment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→