MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112341401 · doi:10.1002/alz.040948

AI‐inferred gene expression trajectories mirror neuropathology and clinical deterioration in neurodegeneration

2020· article· en· W3112341401 on OpenAlexaff
Yasser Iturria‐Medina, Ahmed Faraz Khan, Quadri Adewale, Amir H Shirazi

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropathologyNeurodegenerationPathologicalDiseasePopulationNeuroscienceAmyloid (mycology)Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeIn vivoPathologyMedicineAlzheimer's diseaseInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background We lack robust minimally‐invasive molecular tests for early neurodegenerative detection, hindering the development of better treatment and therapies. Gene expression (GE) has been of crucial value for understanding neurodegenerative evolution, revealing disease‐specific differentiated genes/molecular‐pathways and networks. However, due to the large developing period of neurodegenerative disorders, we lack exhaustive longitudinal datasets covering the continuous molecular transitions underlying disease. Almost all our knowledge of the subjacent pathological mechanisms is based in data “snapshots” taken at a few disease stages. Method We collected in‐vivo GE samples from blood plasma of 744 subjects in the spectrum of late‐onset Alzheimer’s disease (LOAD) and from 1225 post‐mortem brains with LOAD or Huntington’s disease (HD), from ADNI, ROSMAP and HBTRC. The subjects have post‐mortem neuropathology evaluations (Braak, Cerad, Vonsattel staging) or amyloid/tau PET‐based quantifications. Next, we developed the GE contrastive Trajectory Inference (GE‐cTIF) algorithm, allowing the unsupervised machine‐learning identification of enriched GE temporal patterns in the diseased populations (e.g. LOAD) relative to a background population (healthy elderly). See Figure 1. Result Applied to the in‐vivo samples (Figure 2), the individual molecular pathological scores predicted tau positivity ( P <0.001, FEW‐corrected), amyloid positivity ( P <0.001, FEW), tau‐amyloid comorbidity ( P <0.001, FEW), clinical diagnosis ( P <0.001, FEW), memory performance ( P <0.001, FEW), executive function ( P <0.001, FEW) and future clinical conversion ( P <0.001). In the post‐mortem brains, the molecular scores were significantly predictive (P<0.001, FEW) of Braak, Cerad and Vonsattel stages. In addition, the proposed method allowed direct identification of genes and molecular pathways driving neurodegenerative progression. Notably, 85% and 90% of the highly predictive molecular pathways in the neurodegenerating brain (ROSMAP and HBTRC, respectively) were also among the most relevant pathways detected in the blood data (ADNI). Conclusion Results in three independent neurodegenerative datasets support the strong predictive power of GE‐cTI for predicting individual pathophysiology and cognitive decline. The obtained scores are direct measures of molecular integrity, calculated independently of phenotypic/clinical variables and able to be used as unbiased biomarkers in clinical applications. Our results have broad implications for uncovering dynamic mechanisms of molecular pathology, patient stratification in the clinic, and monitor response to personalized treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicHealth, Environment, Cognitive AgingFrench-language works237,207