MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112431772 · doi:10.1142/s1793524521500261

The transmission of dengue virus with <i>Aedes aegypti</i> mosquito in a heterogeneous environment

2020· article· en· W3112431772 on OpenAlexaff
Mengyun Zhang, Zhigui Lin, Huaiping Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biomathematics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersMajor Research PlanInternational Cooperation and Exchange Programme
KeywordsAedes aegyptiDengue feverPopulationBiologyTransmission (telecommunications)VirologyBasic reproduction numberDengue virusAedesMathematicsDemographyEcologyComputer scienceLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with dengue virus transmitted by the mosquito Aedes aegypti. A reaction–diffusion model is proposed incorporating both human and the A. aegypti population, where we divided mosquitoes into two sub-populations: the winged population and an aquatic form, with the winged mosquito population divided into the susceptible and infected classes. The threshold [Formula: see text] depending on spatial heterogeneity is introduced for the mosquito population. Moreover, we introduce the basic reproduction number [Formula: see text] for the infected classes, as well as its analytical properties. [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are utilized to investigate the stability of the mosquito-established equilibriums. Our results show that the mosquitoes persist if [Formula: see text], while the transmission of dengue virus depends on the condition whether [Formula: see text] or [Formula: see text].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.310
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiomathematicsSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207