DIPG-55. PATTERNS OF CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DIVERSION AND SURVIVAL IN CHILDREN WITH DIFFUSE INTRINSIC PONTINE GLIOMA: A REPORT FROM THE INTERNATIONAL DIPG REGISTRY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There is no standard of care for cerebrospinal (CSF) diversion in children with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), nor understanding of survival impact. We evaluated CSF diversion characteristics in children with DIPG to determine incidence, indications and potential impact on survival. Data was extracted from subjects registered in the International DIPG registry (IDIPGR). IDIPGR team personnel obtained clinical and radiographic data from the registry database and when appropriate, abstracted additional data from individual medical records. Univariable analyses were performed using the Fisher’s exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum test. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Evaluable patients (n=457) met criteria for DIPG diagnosis by central radiology review. Ninety-two patients (20%) had permanent CSF diversion. Indications for permanent diversion were hydrocephalus (41%), hydrocephalus and clinical symptoms (35%), and clinical symptoms alone (3%). Those with permanent diversion were significantly younger at diagnosis than those without diversion (median 5.3 years vs 6.9 years, p=0.0002), otherwise no significant differences in gender, race, or treatment were found. The progression-free and overall survival of those with permanent CSF diversion compared to those without permanent diversion was 4.5 and 10.9 months vs 6.9 and 11.2 months, respectively (p=0.001, p= 0.4). There was no significant difference in overall survival in patients with or without permanent CSF diversion among a large cohort of DIPG patients. Patients without permanent diversion had significantly prolonged progression free survival compared to those with permanent diversion. The qualitative risks and benefits of permanent CSF diversion need to be further evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".