TALIF measurements of hydrogen and deuterium surface loss probabilities on quartz in low pressure high density plasmas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This article deals with surface loss on quartz of atomic hydrogen (H) and its isotope deuterium (D) in a low-pressure (10 Pa) pulsed inductively coupled plasma. The atomic temporal decay in the post discharge is measured by two-photon absorption laser-induced fluorescence (TALIF). From the loss rate, the atomic surface loss probability is determined. In pure hydrogen or pure deuterium gas, no isotopic effect on surface kinetics has been observed and the surface loss probabilities of H and D were found to be almost identical and equal to ∼1.8%. However, despite the lack of difference in surface loss probability, a net isotopic effect on surface loss rate due to the mass difference between the isotopes is measured. Hydrogen atoms diffuse faster and have higher flux to the plasma chamber walls than deuterium atoms. Hydrogen atoms are therefore lost at higher rate than deuterium atoms. Based on the observed isotopic difference and on the comparison between H and D TALIF signals, the isotopic effects on H and D atom production are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".