MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3112615151 · doi:10.1002/alz.046393

Lower average daily step count is associated with poorer executive function and rurality in a veteran cohort

2020· article· en· W3112615151 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lisa C. Silbert, Rachel C Wall, Zachary Beattie, Hiroko H. Dodge, Nora Mattek, Thomas Riley, Jeffrey Kaye

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRuralityMedicineCohortActivities of daily livingGerontologyPopulationCognitionDementiaDemographyRural areaCohort studyCognitive declineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPhysical therapyCognitive impairmentEnvironmental healthInternal medicinePsychiatryDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background An active lifestyle is associated with better cognitive health in older individuals. This relationship is understudied in U.S. Veterans, a population at risk of cognitive impairment due to the high prevalence of associated risk factors and comorbidities. Passive monitoring of daily activities provides objective measures of activity that may serve as a sensitive index of day‐to‐day function and dementia risk. Method Participants (age > 57) were enrolled as part of Collaborative Aging Research using Technology (CART), a multi‐site study examining the feasibility of unobtrusive remote sensing and monitoring of physical, cognitive, and health‐related activities. The Veteran cohort consists of volunteers living in largely rural communities in the Pacific Northwest, self‐identified as being a Veteran, and included their cohabitant, if applicable. Daily step counts were acquired using a wrist‐worn device. Baseline one‐month averages were compared with rurality and cognitive function. Result 114 nondemented participants residing in 67 homes underwent neuropsychological assessment and passive monitoring of daily activities (55% male, age 70.7, MOCA 23.4). 70% resided in a rural area (rural‐urban commuting area (RUCA) score > 4 ) and 29% had > three vascular risk factors. Participants with 14+ days of gait activity measured within a one‐month period near baseline cognitive assessments not using a walker in the home were included (n = 107). Average daily step count obtained over an average of 27.7 days was 3,065 (median 2,515) and was greater in large rural towns compared with small‐isolated rural (p = 0.07) or urban (p = 0.04) towns. After adjusting for potential confounders, lower average daily steps were associated with worse performance in executive function, a relationship observed in Veterans in large rural, but not urban or small rural towns. Conclusion In a cohort comprised primarily of rural Veteran’s and their spouses, lower average number of steps per day is associated with poorer executive function and this relationship varied by rurality. Real‐world monitoring of daily activities may identify those at greatest risk of cognitive decline for interventional studies aimed at dementia prevention in older individuals, and is of particular relevance in rural settings, where access to specialty care is limited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→