MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3112650824 · doi:10.1002/alz.043529

Automatic early detection of cognitive decline

2020· article· en· W3112650824 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Neta B. Maimon, Lior Molcho, Tomer Loterrman, Narkiss Pressburger, Ady Sasson, Nathan Intrator

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionCognitive declineElectroencephalographyWearable computerComputer sciencePopulationElementary cognitive taskCognitive impairmentMontreal Cognitive AssessmentCognitive psychologyAudiologyPsychologyArtificial intelligenceMedicineDementiaNeuroscienceDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background While it is agreed that cognitive decline is underdiagnosed, there is still no single universally accepted and affordable screening method that satisfies all needs in the detection of cognitive impairment. The goal of this presentation is to demonstrate an automatic cognitive decline assessment with Neurosteer Aurora, utilizing a novel EEG analysis as a method for characterization of cognitive activity and detection of early cognitive impairment. Method Neurosteer has developed a miniature wearable neurological sensor combined with an automatic assessment tool for a wide range of brain monitoring and treatment needs. It is based on a single EEG channel and relies on advanced mathematical analysis for a decomposition of the EEG signal into multiple components. These components are then processed with machine learning algorithms to create high level biomarkers for real‐time brain activity interpretation. Additionally, Neurosteer has developed a fully automatic assessment and biomarkers for cognitive decline. It is based on a verbal and musical cognitive assessment during brain activity recording. Machine learning algorithms analyze the combined data to produce a simple‐to‐read report indicating the level of different aspects of cognitive decline. We applied this technology on three different healthy population (N=14, 40, 215) and cognitively impaired (N=24, 10, 9, 8) undergoing several automatically administered cognitive tasks. Result A few biomarkers were extracted using machine learning tools on the collected data. The biomarkers distinguished between different levels of cognitive load as well as resting state patterns. The new groups of cognitively impaired populations were examined with Neurosteer Aurora, completing short and automatic auditory assessments. The patterns of the predefined biomarkers were significantly different for each population, differentiating between clinical populations and negatively correlated with the severity of cognitive decline. Conclusion Using the novel brain activity interpretation and biomarkers enables an automatic and easy‐to‐administer cognitive decline assessment in the clinical population. Such assessment is a step forward towards a wide‐spread screening, allowing early and personalized intervention to slow down cognitive decline, improving health and quality of life outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces→French-language works237,207→