MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112666162 · doi:10.1021/acsapm.0c01117

Plasma Treatment of Composite Piezoelectric Thin Films for Good Adhesion of Printed Conductive Ink

2020· article· en· W3112666162 on OpenAlexafffund
Kiran Kumar Sappati, Bishakh Rout, Pierre‐Luc Girard‐Lauriault, Sharmistha Bhadra

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Polymer Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceContact angleComposite materialWettingAtmospheric-pressure plasmaSurface modificationPolydimethylsiloxaneComposite numberThin filmPlasma etchingLayer (electronics)PlasmaEtching (microfabrication)NanotechnologyChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lead zirconate titanate and polydimethylsiloxane (PZT–PDMS) thin films are an attractive choice for a flexible piezoelectric substrate. In this work, the surface modification of the PZT–PDMS composite with plasma treatment is developed to fabricate flexible conductor patterns or devices directly on the composite surface. Optimized plasma treatment conditions are achieved by varying plasma parameters such as the pressure of treatment, type of gas, gas flow, and time of treatment. Plasma polymerization is carried out using C 2 H 4 –CO 2, and argon (Ar) is used for the surface ablation effect in low-pressure conditions. Atmospheric pressure plasma (APP) is performed in a N 2 atmosphere which has a surface etching effect. All the treatments create a hydrophilic layer, which is confirmed with water contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared analysis. Silver conductive ink was printed on the plasma-treated films to fabricate flexible conductive patterns, and the bonding strength was tested by performing adhesive tests such as tape, ultrasonic, and soak tests. APP treatment under a N 2 environment with a 300 V input voltage, 21.5 kHz frequency, and 2 min deposition time proves to be the most efficient surface modification technique. This treatment produces a silica-like layer on the composite surface and results in better wettability. It reduces the contact angle from 108 to 20° immediately after the treatment and shows strong adhesion during several rigorous adhesion tests. The printed conductive patterns on the N 2 -treated film show strong mechanical stability and exhibit great electric conductivity under bending and releasing. The APP treatment under N 2 environment can overcome the adhesion issue of the printed conductive layer on the hydrophobic composite surfaces. Moreover, all the above plasma treatments have a negligible effect on the piezoelectric properties of PZT–PDMS films.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Polymer MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207