MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112673934 · doi:10.1002/alz.039280

Association between mean corpuscular volume and cognitive impairment in an 8‐year cohort study in the community‐dwelling elderly

2020· article· en· W3112673934 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yiming Li, Yen‐Ching Chen, Jen‐Han Chen, Jeng‐Min Chiou, Ta‐Fu Chen, Liang‐Chuan Lai

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMean corpuscular volumeMedicineDementiaCognitionCohortVerbal fluency testGerontologyInternal medicineNeuropsychologyDiseasePsychiatryHemoglobin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is the average volume of red blood cells (RBC). Larger MCV reduces the amount of RBC reaching the brain, while smaller MCV was associated with iron‐deficiency anemia and the subsequent cognitive impairment. Few studies have relating MCV levels to cognitive impairment and their findings were inconsistent. This study aimed to explore this association in community‐dwelling older adults. Method This study is part of an ongoing cohort study Taiwan Initiatives for Geriatric Epidemiological Research (TIGER, 2011‐ present). A total of 605 non‐demented older adults (age 65+) were recruited at baseline (2011‐2013). After exclusion of participants with dementia at baseline, history of stroke, brain tumor, loss of consciousness, missing data of MCV, 319 elderly were included for analysis. Global and domain‐specific cognition (logical memory, attention, verbal fluency, and executive function) were assessed for each participant at baseline, 2‐year, 4‐year, and 6‐year follow‐ups. MCV was assessed at baseline and then tertitled; high MCV indicates the highest tertile (≥92.7 fL); low MCV indicates the lower tertiles (<92.6 fL). The generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) were used to estimate the association between MCV and cognitive impairment adjusted for important covariates. Result At baseline, the mean age of the study participants was 71.6 years old and the mean MCV at baseline was 90.7 fL. For the multivariable analyses, the effect of baseline MCV on global cognition (assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment–Taiwanese version, MoCA‐T) increased as age increased [MCV×age interaction: β= ‐0.07, 90% confidence interval (CI)= ‐0.14 to ‐0.004, p‐value= 0.04], which became more evident in women (β= ‐0.15, 95% CI= ‐0.23 to ‐0.06). After stratification by age groups, the increase of baseline MCV was associated with poor global cognition in the older group (age ≥75: β= ‐0.90, 95% CI= ‐1.65 to ‐0.15). No significant findings were observed in cognitive domains or other strata. Conclusion High baseline MCV was associated with an increased risk of cognitive impairment as age increased. MCV may be used an early marker for dementia in the community‐dwelling older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisFrench-language works237,207