HGG-35. PEDIATRIC PLEOMORPHIC XANTHOASTROCYTOMA WITH ANAPLASIA TREATED WITH SURGERY AND ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY: A CASE SERIES OF 3 LONG-TERM SURVIVORS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract OBJECTIVE Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) with anaplasia is a rare histological subtype of central nervous system astrocytoma and generally treated as high grade gliomas. The optimal extent of therapy required is unknown. Here we report on 3 pediatric cases of PXA with anaplasia. We also describe molecular features and methylation profile of PXA with anaplasia compared to age-matched PXA without anaplasia. METHODS Our institutional database was queried for cases of PXA since 1998 and 3 cases with anaplasia were identified and records reviewed. RESULTS 2/3 patients were male and all were aged 12 at diagnosis. All underwent a gross total resection (GTR), where the diagnosis of PXA with anaplasia was made. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that two cases were BRAF V600E positive and two were CD34 positive. Methylation profiling revealed unique pattern of CpG methylation/unmethylation. All patients underwent 5400cGy radiation to the surgical bed. 2/3 patients received concurrent temozolamide with radiation followed by maintenance chemotherapy with temozolamide and lomustine for 6 cycles as per the Children’s Oncology Group Protocol ACNS0423. These two patients had a continued complete response. The third patient received temozolamide following radiation and subsequently had recurrent disease at the end of treatment and went on to have a re-resection GTR and achieved complete response after 6 cycles of lomustine, vincristine and procarbazine. All are alive with no evidence of disease at more than 2 years post treatment completion (OS=100%,EFS=67%). CONCLUSIONS This rare pediatric tumor is not well understood. The genetic landscape may be informative for optimizing treatment and prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".