MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112795109 · doi:10.2118/201575-ms

Feasibility of Combining Gas-Assisted Gravity Drainage GAGD with Water Injection in a Thick Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoir Using 3-D Experimental Physical Model and Simulation

2020· article· en· W3112795109 on OpenAlexaff
Yingfeng Peng, Yiqiang Li, Hemanta Sarma, Shenen Gao, Debin Kong

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringEnhanced oil recoveryWater injection (oil production)CarbonateAquiferReservoir simulationGeologyWettingOil in placeDrainageEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceGroundwaterGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Enhancing oil recovery from thick heterogeneous carbonate reservoirs poses great challenges, be it through waterflooding or gasflooding. In this study, a three-layer 3D physical model was established based on artificial core technology and scaling criteria, taking into account the mineral composition, petrophysical properties, pore structure, wettability, heterogeneity, dynamic, bottom aquifer, interlayers, and well pattern. Experiments were carried out under circumstance of high temperature and high pressure. A numerical simulation model incorporated with local geological characteristics was built for subject well-area unit. The development process and ultimate oil recovery of conventional water injection, gas-assisted gravity drainage (GAGD), edge-bottom water injection (EBWI), and a method of combination of GAGD and EBWI proposed in this paper, named CGE were studied. For this kind of reservoirs, the experiments showed that, oil recovery of GAGD and EBWI were 40.01% and 37.11%, respectively, higher than conventional waterflooding process, while CGE had the most potential with oil recovery 43.85%. The numerical simulation showed that, oil recovery of CGE was 49.87% and the water cut was extremely low in the first 11 years. GAGD significantly increased Bond Number and had strong water control ability, but it relied on the pressure accumulation, thus there was a non-effective period. EBWI had no obvious non-effective periods, and thus enhancing oil recovery in the early stage through forced gravity displacement. CGE is a feasible and efficient combination development method, although there is still a problem of water control in the later stage. In addition to the research of EOR methods, this paper also helps broaden the means of researching carbonate reservoirs and design more schemes, based on the successful implement of the experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207