DeORFanizing <i>Candida albicans</i> Genes using Co-Expression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Functional characterization of open reading frames in non-model organisms, such as the common opportunistic fungal pathogen Candida albicans , can be labor intensive. To meet this challenge, we built a comprehensive and unbiased co-expression network for C. albicans , which we call CalCEN, from data collected from 853 RNA sequencing runs from 18 large scale studies deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive. Retrospectively, CalCEN is highly predictive of known gene function annotations and can be synergistically combined with sequence similarity and interaction networks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through orthology for additional accuracy in gene function prediction. To prospectively demonstrate the utility of the co-expression network in C. albicans , we predicted the function of under-annotated open reading frames (ORF)s and identified CCJ1 as a novel cell cycle regulator in C. albicans . This study provides a tool for future systems biology analyses of gene function in C. albicans. We provide a computational pipeline for building and analyzing the co-expression network and CalCEN itself at ( http://github.com/momeara/CalCEN ). Importance Candida albicans is a common and deadly fungal pathogen of humans, yet the genome of this organism contains many genes of unknown function. By determining gene function, we can help identify essential genes, new virulence factors, or new regulators of drug resistance, and thereby give new targets for antifungal development. Here, we use information from large scale RNAseq studies and generate a C. albicans co-expression network (CalCEN) that is robust and able to predict gene function. We demonstrate the utility of this network in both retrospective and prospective testing, and use CalCEN to predict a role for C4_06590W/ CCJ1 in cell cycle. This tool will allow for a better characterization of under-annotated genes in pathogenic yeasts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".