MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112908321 · doi:10.1080/2576117x.2020.1845561

Abnormal Head Posture in Unilateral Superior Oblique Palsy

2020· article· en· W3112908321 on OpenAlex
Masoud Khorrami‐Nejad, Mohamad Reza Akbari, Haleh Kangari, Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban, Babak Masoomian, Mahsa Ranjbar-Pazooki

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinHead tiltPalsyMedicineOrthodonticsSurgeryPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAudiologyAnatomyOphthalmologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: To evaluate the manifestations and severity of abnormal head posture (AHP) in unilateral congenital and acquired superior oblique palsy (SOP) patients and to assess the effect of AHP on facial appearance.Patients and methods: This case series study was performed on 60 consecutive SOP patients, which consisted of 47 patients with congenital SOP and 13 patients with the acquired source. The exact type of AHP in congenital and acquired cases was determined based on direct observation. In addition, a close-up picture from 40 cm with habitual AHP was captured from all patients. For evaluation of the severity of AHP and measurement of head tilt, these pictures were analyzed by the Corel Draw X7 software (Corel Corp, Canada). Besides, qualitative and quantitative facial asymmetry parameters were evaluated by the assessment of pictures of patients, which were taken in different gazes.Results: Five different manifestations of AHP were observed to the contralateral side of the palsy; 1 – pure head tilt, 2 – simultaneous head tilt and turn, 3 – pure head turn, 4 – head tilt and chin down, and 5 – head tilt and turn with chin down. The frequency of these five manifestations of AHP in the congenital group were 23 (48.9%), 10 (21.3%), 4 (8.5%), 5 (10.6%), and 5 (10.6%) patients, respectively (P <.001) and in acquired patients, were 1 (7.7%), 8 (61.5%), 2 (15.4%), 2 (15.4%), and 0 (0%), respectively (P =.024). In all SOP patients, the most common manifestations of AHP were pure head tilt (40%), simultaneous head tilt and turn (30%), and head tilt with chin down (11.7%), respectively. The mean degrees of head tilt in congenital and acquired patients were 15.10° ± 9.34° and 9.61° ± 5.84°, respectively (P =.022).Conclusion: The most common type of AHP in congenital SOP patients was contralateral head tilt, but in acquired cases was simultaneous head tilt and turn. The mean amount of head tilt in the acquired group was significantly higher than congenital patients; in contrast, the frequency of facial asymmetry was higher in the congenital group compared with the acquired patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.478

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it