MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112948080 · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020202861

Pulmonary Ventilation Maps Generated with Free-breathing Proton MRI and a Deep Convolutional Neural Network

2020· article· en· W3112948080 on OpenAlexafffund
Dante P. I. Capaldi, Fumin Guo, Lei Xing, Grace Párraga

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMedicineVentilation (architecture)Nuclear medicineNoble gasLungMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Hyperpolarized noble gas MRI helps measure lung ventilation, but clinical translation remains limited. Free-breathing proton MRI may help quantify lung function using existing MRI systems without contrast material and may assist in providing information about ventilation not visible to the eye or easily extracted with segmentation methods. Purpose To explore the use of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) to generate synthetic MRI ventilation scans from free-breathing MRI (deep learning [DL] ventilation MRI)–derived specific ventilation maps as a surrogate of noble gas MRI and to validate this approach across a wide range of lung diseases. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of prospective trials, 114 paired noble gas MRI and two-dimensional free-breathing MRI scans were obtained in healthy volunteers with no history of chronic or acute respiratory disease and in study participants with a range of different obstructive lung diseases, including asthma, bronchiectasis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and non–small-cell lung cancer between September 2013 and April 2018 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03169673, NCT02351141, NCT02263794, NCT02282202, NCT02279329, and NCT02002052). A U-Net–based DCNN model was trained to map free-breathing proton MRI to hyperpolarized helium 3 (3He) MRI ventilation and validated using a sixfold validation. During training, the DCNN ventilation maps were compared with noble gas MRI scans using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and mean absolute error. DCNN ventilation images were segmented for ventilation and ventilation defects and were compared with noble gas MRI scans using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Relationships were evaluated with the Spearman correlation coefficient (rS). Results One hundred fourteen study participants (mean age, 56 years ± 15 [standard deviation]; 66 women) were evaluated. As compared with 3He MRI, DCNN model ventilation maps had a mean r value of 0.87 ± 0.08. The mean DSC for DL ventilation MRI and 3He MRI ventilation was 0.91 ± 0.07. The ventilation defect percentage for DL ventilation MRI was highly correlated with 3He MRI ventilation defect percentage (rS = 0.83, P < .001, mean bias = −2.0% ± 5). Both DL ventilation MRI (rS = −0.51, P < .001) and 3He MRI (rS = −0.61, P < .001) ventilation defect percentage were correlated with the forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The DCNN model required approximately 2 hours for training and approximately 1 second to generate a ventilation map. Conclusion In participants with diverse pulmonary pathologic findings, deep convolutional neural networks generated ventilation maps from free-breathing proton MRI trained with a hyperpolarized noble-gas MRI ventilation map data set. The maps showed correlation with noble gas MRI ventilation and pulmonary function measurements. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Vogel-Claussen in this issue.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiologySame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207