MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3112977008

A Traveling Convection Vortex Event Study: Instantaneous Ionospheric Equivalent Currents, Estimation of Field-aligned Currents, and The Role of Induced Currents

2002· article· en· W3112977008 on OpenAlexaffabout
O. Amm, M. J. Engebretson, Thomas J.R. Hughes, L R Newitt, A. Viljanen, J. Watermann

Bibliographic record

VenueEGS General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonosphereVortexGeophysicsGeologyClockwisePhysicsNoonConvectionCurrent (fluid)Mesoscale meteorologyGeodesyAtmospheric sciencesMechanicsMeteorologyAmplitude
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[1] We analyze a traveling convection vortex (TCV) event on 31 January 1997 using ground magnetometer data of the CANOPUS, MACCS, Geological Survey of Canada, Greenland, and IMAGE networks. For the first time, spatial and instantaneous distributions of the mesoscale ionospheric equivalent currents associated with a TCV are obtained. We apply the method of spherical elementary currents (SECS) to calculate these currents, as well as to infer the part of the ground magnetic signatures that is caused by internal currents induced in the Earth. The resulting ionospheric equivalent currents consist of a leading clockwise vortex centered at 71° CGM latitude which moves westward with ∼7.3 km s−1 and a trailing anticlockwise vortex at 77 ° latitude which moves southwestward away from noon at ∼3.0 km s−1. In an area of ∼200 km around the center of the twin vortices the derived equivalent current densities are less than 70 mA m−1 but reach 100–160 mA m−1 in a broad channel of equatorward currents between the vortices. Using the assumption of a uniform Hall to Pedersen conductance ratio and the assumption that conductance gradients perpendicular to the ionospheric electric field are vanishing, we can estimate the field-aligned current (FAC) associated with the TCV. The maxima of ∼1 μA m−2 of downward FAC in the leading western vortex, and of ∼0.4 μA m−2 of upward FAC in the trailing eastern vortex occur along the perimeter of the vortices, not in their centers, in contrast to the prediction of ionosphere-magnetosphere coupling theories for TCVs. The integrated FAC are not fully balanced between the two vortices but show an excess of downward FAC. While the ratio between the internally generated and the total horizontal ground magnetic field for most magnetometer sites in the TCV area amounts to around 20–40%, at some stations it can reach values of 50% and larger.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGS General Assembly Conference AbstractsSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207