History of suicide attempts in patients with bipolar disorder type I: socio-demographic and clinical factors, quality of life and functioning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to evaluate sociodemographic and clinical factors, quality of life (QoL) and functioning associated with history of suicide attempts (SA) in a sample of bipolar disorder (BD) type I patients. METHODS: A total of 417 BD type I patients, with and without history of SA were recruited from two Brazilian specialized Mood Disorder Centers. They were assessed with a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire, the Young Mania Rating Scale, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Structured Clinical Interviews for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF, and the Sheehan Disability Scale. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-nine (42.9%) patients had a history of SA. There were no statistically significant sociodemographic differences between BD patients with and without a history of SA. Logistic regression found that lifetime hospitalization, comorbid anxiety disorders, depressive polarity in the first episode, current intensity of depressive symptoms, history of rapid cycling, family history of suicide and age at onset were significantly associated with SA in BD. Multiple linear regression showed that SA had no effect on QoL and functioning, which were affected mainly by comorbid anxiety disorders and current intensity of depressive symptoms, even in patients considered euthymic. CONCLUSION: Suicidal behavior in patients with BD is a complex phenomenon and reflects a more severe course of illness. Patients with history of SA may have worse QoL and functional impairment not because of its direct effect, but because of the greater association with clinical factors related to poor prognosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".