MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113130384

Traces of powers of matrices over finite fields

2021· article· en· W3113130384 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersEuropean Research Council
KeywordsMathematicsFinite fieldUnitary matrixCombinatoricsHaar measurePolynomialPrime powerPrime (order theory)Random matrixRate of convergenceClassical groupMatrix (chemical analysis)Unitary groupDistribution (mathematics)Symplectic geometryDiscrete mathematicsFunction fieldField (mathematics)Unitary stateEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisLie group
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LetM be a random matrix chosen according to Haar measure from the unitary group U(n,C). Diaconis and Shahshahani proved that the traces of M,M2, . . . ,Mk converge in distribution to independent normal variables as n→∞, and Johansson proved that the rate of convergence is superexponential in n. We prove a finite field analogue of these results. Fixing a prime power q = pr, we choose a matrix M uniformly from the finite unitary group U(n, q) ⊆ GL(n, q2) and show that the traces of {Mi} 1≤i≤k, pi converge to independent uniform variables in Fq2 as n. Moreover we show the rate of convergence is exponential in n2. We also consider the closely related problem of the rate at which characteristic polynomial of M equidistributes in 'short intervals' of Fq2 [T]. Analogous results are also proved for the general linear, special linear, symplectic and orthogonal groups over a finite field. In the two latter families we restrict to odd characteristic. The proofs depend upon applying techniques from analytic number theory over function fields to formulas due to Fulman and others for the probability that the characteristic polynomial of a random matrix equals a given polynomial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.282
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)Same topicAdvanced Algebra and GeometryFrench-language works237,207