Functional idiosyncrasy has a shared topography with group-level connectivity alterations in autism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is commonly understood as a network disorder, yet case-control analyses against typically-developing controls (TD) have yielded somewhat inconsistent patterns of results. The current work was centered on a novel approach to profile functional network idiosyncrasy, the inter-individual variability in the association between functional network organization and brain anatomy, and we tested the hypothesis that idiosyncrasy contributes to connectivity alterations in ASD. Studying functional network idiosyncrasy in a multi-centric dataset with 157 ASD and 172 TD, our approach revealed higher idiosyncrasy in ASD in the default mode, somatomotor and attention networks together with reduced idiosyncrasy in the lateral temporal lobe. Idiosyncrasy was found to increase with age in both ASD and TD, and was significantly correlated with symptom severity in the former group. Association analysis with structural and molecular brain features indicated that patterns of functional network idiosyncrasy were not correlated with ASD-related cortical thickness alterations, but closely with the spatial expression patterns of intracortical ASD risk genes. In line with our main hypothesis, we could demonstrate that idiosyncrasy indeed plays a strong role in the manifestation of connectivity alterations that are measurable with conventional case-control designs and may, thus, be a principal driver of inconsistency in the autism connectomics literature. These findings support important interactions between the heterogeneity of individuals with an autism diagnosis and group-level functional signatures, and help to consolidate prior research findings on the highly variable nature of the functional connectome in ASD. Our study promotes idiosyncrasy as a potential individualized diagnostic marker of atypical brain network development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".