Evolution of octopod sperm II: Comparison of acrosomal morphogenesis in <i>Eledone</i> and <i>Octopus</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The first stages of acrosome development during Eledone cirrhosa spermiogenesis are similar to that in Octopus vulgaris , and comprise the initial elongation of both organelles. However, the acrosome in E. cirrhosa does not continue its elongation as it does in O. vulgaris . Instead, its length remains fixed and it undergoes a process of helicoidization that includes the entire organelle. In each spermatid, helicoidization of the E. cirrhosa acrosome occurs simultaneously with helicoidization of the nucleus. The acrosome is associated with special structures that probably are involved in the helical torsion of the organelle. We propose a hypothesis to explain the evolutionary relationship between the acrosomes of O. vulgaris and E. cirrhosa , particularly as it is influenced by nucleomorphogenesis and microtubular contraction. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 62: 363–367, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it